<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate-Rising Tip #7 &#8211; Have a crapload of kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/</link>
	<description>Helping you make the weather more desirable by speeding up global warming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rueger</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Go Duggers!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Duggers!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-194</guid>
		<description>See, I&#039;m completely opposed to having children, but also completely opposed to the environment.  Not having kids means you can earn more money in life, which translates into buying two-door sports cars that drink gas faster than a man in the desert drinks water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I&#8217;m completely opposed to having children, but also completely opposed to the environment.  Not having kids means you can earn more money in life, which translates into buying two-door sports cars that drink gas faster than a man in the desert drinks water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben N.</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Actually Big, as long as the polygamy is with your wife and single females, the solution is valid. They aren&#039;t married, so just find yourself a wife and 1 or 2 on the side who have no significant others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Big, as long as the polygamy is with your wife and single females, the solution is valid. They aren&#8217;t married, so just find yourself a wife and 1 or 2 on the side who have no significant others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hawk</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hello Matt,

Great website, makes me laugh!  Polygamy sounds good to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Matt,</p>
<p>Great website, makes me laugh!  Polygamy sounds good to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Mr. B Rickus,

This is a fantastic idea. It&#039;s people like you who make this a better world. I&#039;m truly greatful for your input. I have a friend in the senate. I&#039;ll give this to him right away so that he can start writing legislation. Hopefully we can just tack this on to some legislation that will be sure to pass. Keep up the good work my friend. You&#039;re a true AG.

Best,
M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. B Rickus,</p>
<p>This is a fantastic idea. It&#8217;s people like you who make this a better world. I&#8217;m truly greatful for your input. I have a friend in the senate. I&#8217;ll give this to him right away so that he can start writing legislation. Hopefully we can just tack this on to some legislation that will be sure to pass. Keep up the good work my friend. You&#8217;re a true AG.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggus Rickus</title>
		<link>http://goantigreen.com/2008/10/07/climate-raising-tip-7-have-a-crapload-of-kids/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggus Rickus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goantigreen.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Awesome site, but you&#039;ve made a miscalculation here. Having 22 children by different women limits both potential numbers and male access to said women. The first is obviously a problem to the movement, and the latter will only cause resentment among young men lacking the resources to acquire and maintain multiple wives. The solution as I see it is to implement a 22 child policy (see China&#039;s one child policy for how this might work). You may consider this authoritarian, but the environment is not going to be destroyed with half-measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome site, but you&#8217;ve made a miscalculation here. Having 22 children by different women limits both potential numbers and male access to said women. The first is obviously a problem to the movement, and the latter will only cause resentment among young men lacking the resources to acquire and maintain multiple wives. The solution as I see it is to implement a 22 child policy (see China&#8217;s one child policy for how this might work). You may consider this authoritarian, but the environment is not going to be destroyed with half-measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
